Connie Gordon on the lack of separation
between church and state in Israel - Published in the Times/Picayune.
When I sent the following letter
to the T-P, I was reacting to an article that appeared on the Religion
page on Saturday, April 14, entitled, "Passover Police Raid
Restaurants", the opening paragraph of which read, "Alexander
Dardikman had unusual visitors at his restaurant Monday, a pair
of inspectors sent by Interior Minister Eli Yishai, who is strictly
Orthodox. Their mission: to check whether the restaurant served
bread and other leavened goods prohibited by Jewish law on Passover,
the holiday being observed this week." The article went on
to desribe other laws in a country where "religion and state
are intertwined" and where many nonobservant Israelis resent
attempts to regulate public and private life through religious legislation,
most of which is Orthodox.
Here is what I wrote, unedited:
Dear Editor:
I was incensed by the article on
Saturday's Religion Page (April 14) which reported that much of
Israeli law is imposed under Orthodox rules. Stores may not be open
on the Jewish Sabbath, Jewish marriages are recognized only if conducted
by Orthodox rabbis, and leavened goods may not be served in restaurants
on Passover. These, and other such laws in Israel, seem harsh and
single-minded when one considers that theirs is a democratically
elected government fashioned much after ours, and that not all Israeli
citizens are Jewish much less Orthodox.
Isn't it wonderful that in our own
country, when the founding fathers fashioned the Constitution, they
had the foresight to see that, although the early colonists were
mostly Christian, they were from various sects of Christianity and
that ultimately people would come to these shores from many nations,
many cultures, and many religions? It was very wise of James Madison
and the other framers of the Constitution to produce a set of rules
and laws that would be for all the people. They seemd to realize
that religous beliefs were highly personal and that there were differences
even among the sects of Christianity. They were so wise as to omit
God entirely from the Constitution and to guarantee that the government
would never be able to impose any form of relgion on the citizenry.
That freedom to have your own personal
belief system and to worship or not as you please is in peril. Every
day there is another proposal to post the Christian ten commandments
on public walls, to impose open Christian prayers in our public
schools, and now the federal government would like to give your
tax money to faith-based programs. Doesn't it bother you that those
in public leadership roles would impose their own religious rules
and values on your personal beliefs? It bothers me. I wonder which
form of Christianity they would deem the "right" one for
you, for me, for each American. Who decides? I say leave the wall
of separation of church and state alone; I'll eat leavened bread
any time I choose.
Connie Gordon
Back to Essays & Editorials
|